Could we agree to disagree and come together on improvementsandclean-up?
patrick.pelissier at gmail.com
Sat May 31 15:16:05 CEST 2008
>> and the problem that GCC depends on GMP.
> Aaah ... I'm guessing this applies to gcc-4.x.x, but not gcc-3.x.x.
> Are you saying that, if you're using gcc-4.x.x (on any OS), there's not much
> gain from building a non-generic build of gmp ? (I note that the gcc version
> provided by the MinGW64 project is a 4.x.x build.)
> I'm not intending to be antagonistic or prevocative, btw ... it's really
> just that I don't fully understand the point that you are making. (And I
> accept that this lack of understanding is probably *my* failing, not yours.)
If I have understood the point of the MinGW64 project, it is that GCC 4.3.x
requires GMP and MPFR (See http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/changes.html )
to build GCC:
GCC uses GMP for constant folding.
So a static generic version of GMP is enough for GCC needs.
That's my point, and that's all I am talking about.
It has nothing to do with the performance of any GMP on any OS.
It seems to me that we don't talk about the same thing at all..
More information about the gmp-discuss