Could we agree to disagree and come together on improvements and clean-up?

[NightStrike]

On 5/31/08, Patrick Pelissier <patrick.pelissier at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 2:38 AM, NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 5/30/08, Torbjorn Granlund <tg at swox.com> wrote:
> >> Why do people insist on being so abstract on GMP improvements matters?
> >
> > Here's a specific -- Win64
> >
> > It is stagnating our development on mingw-w64.sf.net, and is holding
> > up the entire gcc toolchain for that target platform.

>  I don't understand why using the generic C version of GMP isn't
> enought for GCC needs on win64?
>  ( ./configure --host=none )
>  Could you clarify?
>  Thanks!


Because even the C version suffers from the assumption that long = 64
bits on Win64.