support larger int types
gmpdiscuss at formauri.es
Fri Oct 14 12:01:13 UTC 2016
Torbjörn Granlund wrote, On 2016-10-14 13:44:
> One reasoning contradicts the other, doesn't it?, given that the C standard doesn't guarantee some of those types to exist (especially for fixed-width types). Or is that too academic?
> Which types?
22.214.171.124 Exact-width integer types
2 The following designate exact-width signed integer types:
int8_t int16_t int32_t int64_t
The following designate exact-width unsigned integer types:
uint8_t uint16_t uint32_t uint64_t
(These types need not exist in an implementation.)
This is from the draft, I imagine it hasn't changed in the final version. Apologies if it has.
More information about the gmp-discuss