Could we agree to disagree and come together on improvements and clean-up?

[Sarad AV]

Yes,  thats true and wouldn't expect them to contribute. all the mails here
are read by a wide audience.  i feel there is a better way of wording
things. thats why i thought it was poor PR and can be damaging. It almost
resembled like  a battle field yesterday  :-)

Regards,
Sarad.

On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Joerg Arndt <arndt at jjj.de> wrote:

> * Sarad AV <esarad at gmail.com> [May 31. 2008 23:34]:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Torbjorn Granlund <tg at swox.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >     All those that don't like GMP and feel aggressive about it, go away!
> >
> >
> > This is poor PR and damaging.
> >
> > Sarad.
>
> What could a person that does not like GMP and feels aggressive about it
> possibly contribute?  Anonymous defamation does not count, even when
> crossposted to multiple lists.
>
> Also if people are eager to waste their time for a inferior O/S and
> go through contortions to please a convicted monopolist they are free
> to do so;  but I am tired about the repeated whining about people who
> do _not_ want to to the same.  Adding SCO-style accusations does neither
> add value to their "contributions" on this list.
>
> cheers,   jj
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://gmplib.org/list-archives/gmp-discuss/attachments/20080531/593d8157/attachment.html