<br>Yes,  thats true and wouldn't expect them to contribute. all the mails here are read by a wide audience.  i feel there is a better way of wording things. thats why i thought it was poor PR and can be damaging. It almost resembled like  a battle field yesterday  :-)<br> <br>Regards,<br>Sarad.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Joerg Arndt <<a href="mailto:arndt@jjj.de">arndt@jjj.de</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> * Sarad AV <<a href="mailto:esarad@gmail.com">esarad@gmail.com</a>> [May 31. 2008 23:34]:<br> <div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">><br> ><br> > On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Torbjorn Granlund <<a href="mailto:tg@swox.com">tg@swox.com</a>> wrote:<br> ><br> ><br> ><br> >     All those that don't like GMP and feel aggressive about it, go away!<br> ><br> ><br> > This is poor PR and damaging.<br> ><br> > Sarad.<br> <br> </div></div>What could a person that does not like GMP and feels aggressive about it<br> possibly contribute?  Anonymous defamation does not count, even when<br> crossposted to multiple lists.<br> <br> Also if people are eager to waste their time for a inferior O/S and<br> go through contortions to please a convicted monopolist they are free<br> to do so;  but I am tired about the repeated whining about people who<br> do _not_ want to to the same.  Adding SCO-style accusations does neither<br> add value to their "contributions" on this list.<br> <br> cheers,   jj<br> <br> <br> </blockquote></div><br><br>