Simple question about MPFR vs. GMP
Richard B. Kreckel
kreckel at ginac.de
Sat Apr 8 17:43:16 CEST 2006
Linas Vepstas wrote:
>By standarddizing to IEEE math, some of the "dumb" or "fixable"
>problems got fixed, but this doesn't mean that one can blithly
>ignore sources of inaccuracy in your computations. IEEE rounding
>is not a magic cure-all.
>
>
Obviously. That reminds me of problem C14 at
<http://www.cs.ru.nl/~milad/manydigits/problems.php>.
It's intersting that Paul and his team had to crank up the working
precision in MPFR by approximately the same factor I had to crank it up
in CLN (roughly 12000 decimal digits internal vs. 100 decimal digits
precision goal). If I understood correctly, the iRRAM team did not have
to bother because that library did it correctly under the hood.
Fascinating.
Regards
-richy.
--
Richard B. Kreckel
<http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>
More information about the gmp-discuss
mailing list