GMP and clang bugginess

[Marc Glisse]

On Mon, 25 May 2015, Torbjörn Granlund wrote:

> Marc Glisse <marc.glisse at inria.fr> writes:
>
>  Now I've found it (and reported
>  https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23646 ). Note that the same (?)
>  instruction is spelled differently in the same file:
>
>  	bc+	12, 28, L(9)
>  vs.
>  	blt+	cr7, L(24)
> 
> Note that the former form works with clang 3.5 installs.  A 3.6
> regression?

Indeed...

>  (there is also a mix of using "7" vs "cr7")
>  and llvm is happy with the second form.
>
> Please point me to the place where "7" is used.

Ah, no, my mistake, I got confused by the preprocessing.

-- 
Marc Glisse