GMP and clang bugginess

Torbjörn Granlund tg at
Mon May 25 19:54:26 UTC 2015

Marc Glisse <marc.glisse at> writes:
  Now I've found it (and reported ). Note that the same (?)
  instruction is spelled differently in the same file:
  	bc+	12, 28, L(9)
  	blt+	cr7, L(24)
Note that the former form works with clang 3.5 installs.  A 3.6

  (there is also a mix of using "7" vs "cr7")
  and llvm is happy with the second form.

Please point me to the place where "7" is used.

Please encrypt, key id 0xC8601622

More information about the gmp-devel mailing list