New mpn random generators (Was: Re: mpz_limbs interface)
Torbjorn Granlund
tg at gmplib.org
Tue Jan 21 15:52:54 UTC 2014
nisse at lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
Torbjorn Granlund <tg at gmplib.org> writes:
> nisse at lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
>
> I see. In this particular case, I think the right gmp interface change
> is to add mpn_urandomb and mpn_rrandomb (similar to current mpn_random
> and mpn_random2, but with a randstate argument). If I understand this
> correctly, the main obstacle is that random number internals use mpz
> functions, which is an undesirable dependency for mpn functions.
>
> We should indeed do this.
After 5.2?
Probably, but you're welcome to fix it today also. :-)
Or would you suggest that we postpone the release?
I am not sure exactly how a revamped mpn random interface would look
like. Perhaps mpn_urandomb and mpn_rrandomb, with bit counts (giving
machine indep results).
Current mpn random function take limb counts. I assume it will be good
enough to have just bit counts in the new generators, even at the limb
oriented mpn level. A count like n*GMP_NUMB_BITS is not that bad.
A subtle difference between the current functions and such new functions
would be that the new functions would not make the result "normalised".
At least not mpn_urandomb. (For mpn_rrandomb we might define the most
significant set bit to be defined by the bit count argument.)
We could consider mpn_urandomm, but I am not sure that's a good idea.
> For testing the result, I'd write a wrapper C program that run old and
> new code in separate processes, and compare that the results are
> identical for the same (now and then regenerated) seeds.
If the generation is intended to be machine-independent, it would also
make sense to also add tests generating some random numbers from a few
fixed seeds, and compare to expected (constant) numbers.
Sure, but I think that has been established for the current
implementation already. Thus my suggested test woudl indirectly
establish that for an mpn rewrite. (I am talking about mpz_*random*
here, not new mpn_*random* functions.)
Torbjörn
Please encrypt, key id 0xC8601622
More information about the gmp-devel
mailing list