Shared toom evaluation functions

bodrato at bodrato at
Tue Dec 1 20:53:02 CET 2009


>   I tested also rsblsh_n( , , , ,2) in place of rsblsh2_n, but it fails
> the
>   tests... maybe also its return value needs a clean-up?
> You're welcome to clean this up.

I tried, but please revise my changes, I'm not used to assembler _at_all_.

> If the right conventions are not evident, gmp-devel will probably be
> happy to express some opinions...

I choose for the "carry", as for rsblsh1 and rsblsh2...
But I tested it only inside fib2_ui, where the borrow (carry=-1) can not
be triggered.



More information about the gmp-devel mailing list