Shared toom evaluation functions

Torbjorn Granlund tg at
Tue Dec 1 17:19:22 CET 2009

bodrato at writes:

  > Well...  I cleaned up rsblsh2_n's return value now, -1...3 should be its
  > range, I think.
  I tested also rsblsh_n( , , , ,2) in place of rsblsh2_n, but it fails the
  tests... maybe also its return value needs a clean-up?
You're welcome to clean this up.

If the right conventions are not evident, gmp-devel will probably be
happy to express some opinions...


More information about the gmp-devel mailing list