assertion failure in snprntffuns.c:79 for i686-w64-mingw32
vincent at vinc17.net
Mon Jan 13 09:28:34 UTC 2020
On 2020-01-11 16:33:30 +0100, Marco Bodrato wrote:
> Il Ven, 10 Gennaio 2020 5:04 pm, Vincent Lefevre ha scritto:
> > On 2020-01-10 16:27:31 +0100, Marco Bodrato wrote:
> >> Can you please try with the development version?
> > I get the following error:
> > gmp_vsnprintf return value wrong
> ... because there was an error in the process of cross-compilation...
> > Is there a way to tell GMP's configure that vsnprintf is missing,
> > so that HAVE_VSNPRINTF is not defined?
> Configure should check for it, but checking is not possible for
> cross-compilations. Should we add an option for this case?
> It would be nice if the autotools give support for an optional "emulation
> environment", for a better configuration and an easier testing process...
I wonder why the #define's in config.h are not protected by #ifndef,
so that the user could set the value to 0. I mean that the general
form for macros set by default should have been:
#define HAVE_VSNPRINTF 1
#elif HAVE_VSNPRINTF == 0
FYI, about the snprintf bug in MinGW:
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent at vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
More information about the gmp-bugs