speed of mpq_cmp vs mpq_sub
tg at gmplib.org
Sun May 22 14:19:50 UTC 2016
Marc Glisse <marc.glisse at inria.fr> writes:
I am also surprised, but it is rather easy to reproduce. Maybe you'll
see a bug in my test program?
Your program looks OK.
I suppose multiplying 3 and 5 might make mpq_sub measurements unreliable
if the result of the multiplying yielded non-canonical form.
Using some other constants which are less likely to be contained in the
operands might be a lazy fix (say 101 and 103).
Please encrypt, key id 0xC8601622
More information about the gmp-discuss