AW: AW: WG: AW: use gmp on microcontroller freescale coldfire

[Drößler Tobias]

OK - thanks for your effort explaining me the thematic.

May I can support you AND me to get an smaller GMP ? 

So if you think so - we can discuss what is the best way to do. 
(Separate (sub)project or  scaling /configuration  possibilities.)

Please tell me your  real opinion about it. .. 

Tobias 


Von: tg at gmplib.org [mailto:tg at gmplib.org] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2013 10:04
An: Drößler Tobias
Cc: gmp-discuss at gmplib.org
Betreff: Re: AW: WG: AW: use gmp on microcontroller freescale coldfire

Drößler Tobias <Droessler.Tobias at ik-elektronik.com> writes:

  > We don't provide any configuration options for making GMP that small.
  
  We usually create a binary file, which will be programmed /flashed and
  holds the whole program code .  Is it not possible (or default set)
  that the linker only places used (called) code form the lib inside the
  binary file ?
  
I would assume all current linkers support such incremental linking.
  
What I am trying to say is that no useful subset of GMP's object files will be small enough for your needs; incremental linking will surely help but not enough.

(It would be possible for us to provide smaller GMP configs in the future, mainly by conditionally disabling multiplication primitives.)

--
Torbjörn