Why is it compiling GMP so hard?
Sisyphus
kalinabears at iinet.net.au
Thu Mar 10 00:20:58 CET 2005
Paul Leyland wrote:
>
> Face it: installing a high-performance version of GMP on the Windows
> platform is hard work and, IMO, much harder work than it needs to be.
> It is very Unix-centric (to forestall opposing claims, I am well aware
> that it can be got to work on non-Unix systems) and if you don't have a
> Unix box you have to go out of your way to make it look like Unix.
That's a fairly perverse idea of going "out of your way". It takes a lot
less time to download and install MSYS than it does to install Visual
Studio.
As far as I can see, installing GMP on Win32 is trivial - and making
that trivially-built GMP workable with Visual Studio (if that's what you
want) is even more trivial.
Or - is there a performance hit involved here ?
In other words, what is gained by building GMP the way Brian does it ?
Cheers,
Rob
More information about the gmp-discuss
mailing list