Overflow in mpz_cmp
Marco Bodrato
bodrato at mail.dm.unipi.it
Mon Feb 17 21:59:44 UTC 2020
Ciao,
Il 2020-02-13 08:54 Guillaume Melquiond ha scritto:
> Note that mpz_cmpabs does not have any overflow issue, since absolute
> sizes are subtracted there. So, except maybe for homogeneity with
> mpz_cmp, it can keep using the optimized version.
I pushed a patch for both cmp and cmpabs. So that the second is ready
for a change in the type of the field _mp_size for the mpz_t variables
:-)
But you are right, the patch to cmpabs is not needed for the current
code.
Il 2020-02-10 18:25 Guillaume Melquiond ha scritto:
> The bug was noticed when formally verifying this function.
Did you apply formal verification to other functions? Did they succeed?
Ĝis,
m
More information about the gmp-devel
mailing list