laurent.desnogues at gmail.com
Tue Sep 3 09:08:03 UTC 2019
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:49 AM Torbjörn Granlund <tg at gmplib.org> wrote:
> nisse at lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
> And this on a laptop with an Intel U4100 (5 years old?), so I'd assume
> it doesn't have a particularly fast div instruction. Should we just
> delete div1 ? On which architectures can we expect it to be beneficial?
> It should be fairly easy to find out, if we define a HGCD_DIV1_METHOD
> known to tuneup, to select between plain division and the div1 function.
> Interesting but not too surprising results.
> Intel ark doesn't seem to know any processor called "U4100" so I cannot
> figure out what generation it belongs to.
That most likely is 4100U, a 4th generation chip (aka Haswell).
> IIRC, Intel has not improved plain 64b/64b division since Haswell, which
> is older than 5 years.
> Again, if IIRC, small quotients may result in 16 cycle latency. That's
> the lowest possible timing.
> Please encrypt, key id 0xC8601622
> gmp-devel mailing list
> gmp-devel at gmplib.org
More information about the gmp-devel