General mpn_gcd_basecase
Marco Bodrato
bodrato at mail.dm.unipi.it
Sun Sep 1 21:10:53 UTC 2019
Ciao,
Il Dom, 1 Settembre 2019 6:35 pm, Torbjörn Granlund ha scritto:
> "Marco Bodrato" <bodrato at mail.dm.unipi.it> writes:
> My code: 1.85 bits/iteration
> Your code: 2.60 bits/iteration
> It is worth remembering the table from my experiments with single-limb
> numbers:
> binary tab64 : 479879082 0.401 2.495 40
> binary tab256 : 456126047 0.381 2.625 40
> binary tab1024 : 434483855 0.363 2.755 36
> The now observed 2.60 bits/iteration is very close to the 2.625
> bits/iteration from the table.
My code uses a 256 table... but extends it to a 1024 one...
What does the "binary tab###" single-limb implementation exactly do?
> (I looked briefly at your code, and don't understand it. I haven't had
> time for a proper look yet.)
Yes, storing some unused bits in the table was not a good idea for clarity.
I send it again, I changed some variable names, added some comments and
some #ifdef to experiment the different flavours.
I get:
-DNO_TG_TRICK -DTAB256 -DNLIMBS=10 -DSTAT=1
bits/iteration avg: 2.45
-DTAB256 -DNLIMBS=10 -DSTAT=1
bits/iteration avg: 2.57
-DNO_TG_TRICK -DNLIMBS=10 -DSTAT=1
bits/iteration avg: 2.53
-DNLIMBS=10 -DSTAT=1
bits/iteration avg: 2.60
I added also an "#if 0"-ed bad idea :-)
Ĝis,
m
--
http://bodrato.it/papers/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gcd-tgmb.c
Type: text/x-csrc
Size: 4904 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://gmplib.org/list-archives/gmp-devel/attachments/20190901/7b3244cd/attachment.bin>
More information about the gmp-devel
mailing list