Help stabilising mini-gmp
Niels Möller
nisse at lysator.liu.se
Fri Nov 25 18:10:03 UTC 2016
tg at gmplib.org (Torbjörn Granlund) writes:
> I assume "undefined" means that the computer will not explode, or even
> cause any less dramatic security issues, or even terminate execution.
I think a typical operation with "undefined" meaning is dereferencing a
NULL pointer. Which on most current systems will terminate execution.
A system where left shift can crash seems a bit more unlikely. But I
guess it's conceivable with a processor and C compiler featuring an
"arithmetic left shift" instruction which traps on signed overflow.
Which would be compliant with the C standard.
Bit it's surprising to me too that also non-overflowing left shift of
negative values is undefined. So it seems generally unsafe to use shift
on signed types, except possibly for constants.
/Niels
--
Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid 368C6677.
Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance.
More information about the gmp-devel
mailing list