GMP and clang bugginess

[Marc Glisse]

On Mon, 25 May 2015, Marc Glisse wrote:

> On Mon, 25 May 2015, Torbjörn Granlund wrote:
>
>> Marc Glisse <marc.glisse at inria.fr> writes:
>>
>>  Now I've found it (and reported
>>  https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23646 ). Note that the same (?)
>>  instruction is spelled differently in the same file:
>>
>>  	bc+	12, 28, L(9)
>>  vs.
>>  	blt+	cr7, L(24)
>> 
>> Note that the former form works with clang 3.5 installs.  A 3.6
>> regression?
>
> Indeed...

Er, actually, that's just the time when they enabled the integrated 'as' 
by default, 3.5 was using binutils.

-- 
Marc Glisse