GMP and clang bugginess
marc.glisse at inria.fr
Mon May 25 10:13:38 UTC 2015
On Thu, 21 May 2015, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On powerpc-linux-gnu, clang complains about the bc+ instruction, and
> indeed I can't find that in IBM's documentation. After removing
> divrem_2.asm, it compiles fine and passes the testsuite.
Now I've found it (and reported
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23646 ). Note that the same (?)
instruction is spelled differently in the same file:
bc+ 12, 28, L(9)
blt+ cr7, L(24)
(there is also a mix of using "7" vs "cr7")
and llvm is happy with the second form.
More information about the gmp-devel