nisse at lysator.liu.se
Mon Jan 27 12:07:10 UTC 2014
bodrato at mail.dm.unipi.it writes:
> May I suggest the following patch? I now it is kind of opposite the
> "volatile" proposal to force non-optimising the function...
You're right a const is missing. Your patch looks fine to me. For
consistency, maybe you want to use mp_ptr / mp_srcptr also in the
definition in sec_aors_1.c.
I think the conclusion was that volatile was not very useful for this
function, but if we add that later, does it make any sense to have const
volatile *ap? The intended meaning would be that writes are invalid, and
that no reads should be optimized away.
Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid C0B98E26.
Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance.
More information about the gmp-devel