arm "neon"

[Torbjorn Granlund]

David Miller <davem at davemloft.net> writes:

  From: nisse at lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller)
  Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:22:28 +0100
  
  > Furthermore, gmp needs to be portable to non-glibc systems as well. We
  > have a "fat binary" machinery that tries to solve the same problem, but
  > in a more portable way. Choosing between using IFUNC or the portable
  > machinery at configure time sounds like it could be a lots of additional
  > complexity.
  
  I don't like this kind of logic.
  
  What is the point in creating significantly beneficial facilities like
  IFUNC if the greatest potential benefactors, such as libgmp, use
  straw-men like this to justify not using it?
  
This just rude.  Why don't you give valid arguments instead?  We'd like
to hear your opinion!

-- 
Torbjörn