[Ecm-discuss] wrap-around interface

[Zimmermann Paul]

       Dear Marco,

> > no, I thought about the classical non-redundant representation 0 <= r <
> > B^rn-1.
> 
> On the other side... this redundancy shouldn't hurt your wrap-around
> trick, does it?

in the use we have for GMP-ECM, I guess no. But I can imagine other
(wrap-around trick) applications where one would need a non-redundant residue.

Paul