generic/dive_1.c line 121

Torbjörn Granlund tg at
Tue Nov 1 16:48:04 UTC 2016

Peter Barfuss <pbarfuss at> writes:

  Looking at generic/dive_1.c, this line stuck out as, uh, what on earth:
  Based on the contents of this patchset:
  it indeed looks very superfluous, at best.

It is not only superfluous, it is also redundant, needless and

  Also nearest I can tell
  there are no tests for mpn_divexact or mpn_divexact_1???
Not unit-tested by 'make check' (something they share with dozen of
other low-level functions).  But as evidenced by our coverage analysis
they are indirectly tested:

Please encrypt, key id 0xC8601622

More information about the gmp-bugs mailing list