arm64 asm branch syntax

Torbjorn Granlund tg at
Tue Apr 1 14:25:30 UTC 2014

Marc Glisse <marc.glisse at> writes:

  for arm64, in copy*.asm, we have b.le,,
  In other files, we have beq, bcc, bne (without the dot).
  I think we should stick to a single spelling, preferably the first one
  (with a dot) because some toolchains only accept that one.
  Is there an aarch64 emulator set up somewhere to test such a change? I
  didn't see anything obvious in the testing status page, but I could
  have missed it.

I agree we should stick to the official syntax.  I wish GNU wasn't so

We have, but it is down after some reshuffling.  When
pile gets 32 GiB RAM it will come back (should happen this week).

Please encrypt, key id 0xC8601622

More information about the gmp-bugs mailing list