gmp-5.0.3 / gmp-4.3.2: wrong ABI descission
falk.hayn at gmx.de
Mon Mar 5 11:00:37 CET 2012
thx. for Your reply.
I investigated these thins deeper.
To gibe You th whle view, I need gmp-5.0.3 to build
as a prereq. to build gcc.
I ran in the "wrong ABI" problem in the configure stage of both libs and gcc.
Investigating this issue deeper, I found that autoconf gave a back a wrong negative result.
I do use a clean open source enviroment - everything build from scratch - everything sitting under /usr/local
To workaround this problem I found as workaround
This is strange, because the configure stage found the static libs already.
Three open source kits ran into the same problem. Strange.
What is Your opinion about this ? Is this a gmp problem or a autoconf problem ?
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 16:20:31 +0100
> Von: Torbjorn Granlund <tg at gmplib.org>
> An: "Falk Hayn" <falk.hayn at gmx.de>
> CC: gmp-bugs at gmplib.org
> Betreff: Re: gmp-5.0.3 / gmp-4.3.2: wrong ABI descission
> "Falk Hayn" <falk.hayn at gmx.de> writes:
> I found the following thing I Presume is a bug.
> hostname = my-64bit-itanium-server
> uname -m = ia64 <-- 64 bit
> uname -r = B.11.31
> uname -s = HP-UX
> uname -v = U
> abilist=32 64 <--- the best value at the end ?
> This 32 bit is the best decision on 64 bit platforms ?
> config.log attached.
> What file must be fixed in gmp-5.0.3 to have a clear 64 ABI decision ?
> I feel that the abilist is reverse sorted and the 1st value is trated as
> t the best value ?
> Please see the GMP manual for information about ABI choice in GMP and
> how to control it.
> I don't recall the reasons for defaulting to the 32-bit ABI under hpux,
> but surely there are some efficiency problems with hpux's 64-bit ABI.
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
More information about the gmp-bugs