mpq_class documentation is not explicit about canonicalization

[Marc Glisse]

On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:

> Marc Glisse <marc.glisse at inria.fr> writes:
>
>  texinfo seems happy with:
>
>  @defun mpz_class::mpz_class (type @var{n})
>
>  instead of:
>
>  @deftypefun void mpz_class::mpz_class (type @var{n})
>
> Not really happy, I would say.  The typography gets messed up, at least
> when there is an & in the arguments list.

Indeed, for some reason the & appears bold in the pdf version, I hadn't 
noticed (did you notice anything else?). Weird bug.

> My suggested change it attached.

That is actually the first thing I had tried, and what is already done for 
gmp_randclass.

> Does it look as you expect?

I tried something else because it leaves a space at the beginning of the 
line (between the empty return type and the function name), at least in 
some formats (info maybe?).

Still, it looks good enough to me.

-- 
Marc Glisse