Warnings in GMP.H, and potentially more serious problem
deltatrinity at hotmail.com
Sun May 16 13:52:11 CEST 2004
>From: Torbjorn Granlund <tg at swox.com>
>"delta trinity" <deltatrinity at hotmail.com> writes:
> That solution seem to work. I don't have warnings anymore. I wander if
> MSVC would have give the same warnings. I don't know as I don't have
> If you say that it's the option that will be kept, I could make the
> to the file I've put on my ftp server (pre-compiled shared library), in
> erratum directory for example.
>I think that would be a mistake, since this is no GMP bug.
>The error is in the wolf crying compiler.
Humm, it depend on which side you look at it. It's probably Borland
specific. I know that you probably can't account for every compiler's
moods. Though, my point was just that if the correction gave by Kevin will
end up in the next GMP rev, I could have made the modification.
On the other side, I do understand that it's probably not the best option to
put a second gmp.h online, especially for support. I beleive that having
several different gmp.h could be confusing and probably not desirable.
Though, if someone complain about those warnings, another option could be to
tell them to include a modification to disable warnings in their source
code, as #pragma.
#pragma warn -ccc
#pragma warn -ngu
Best Restaurant Giveaway Ever! Vote for your favorites for a chance to win
$1 million! http://local.msn.com/special/giveaway.asp
More information about the gmp-bugs