Shared toom evaluation functions
tg at gmplib.org
Tue Dec 1 17:19:22 CET 2009
bodrato at mail.dm.unipi.it writes:
> Well... I cleaned up rsblsh2_n's return value now, -1...3 should be its
> range, I think.
I tested also rsblsh_n( , , , ,2) in place of rsblsh2_n, but it fails the
tests... maybe also its return value needs a clean-up?
You're welcome to clean this up.
If the right conventions are not evident, gmp-devel will probably be
happy to express some opinions...
More information about the gmp-devel